CPF reviews and conducts sustainability materiality y assessment on an annual basis in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards and applies the Double Materiality approach, to identify and assess material sustainability matters. The assessment considers Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities (IROs) covering Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) aspects through two dimensions:

  • Impact Materiality: Assesses the actual and potential positive and negative impacts of the Company's business activities on the environment and people, incorporating the perspectives of relevant stakeholders through the stakeholder engagement process.
  • Financial Materiality: Assess the sustainability-related risks and opportunities that that have or could reasonably be expected to have effects on the Company’s financial position and operating performance.

Materiality Assessment Process

01
Identification of Material Sustainability Matters

The Company identifies material sustainability matters topics by considering its business activities throughout the value chain and stakeholder perspectives, while taking into account evolving sustainability contexts through reference to the following sources:

  • GRI Sector Standard for Agriculture, Aquaculture, and Fishing (GRI 13)
  • Sustainability disclosure standards and frameworks, including SASB, TCFD and TNFD
  • Sustainability priorities identified by customers and industry peers
  • Sustainability assessment criteria, applicable laws and regulations, as well as relevant reports and data sources
02
Prioritization of Material Sustainability Matters

The Company prioritizesmaterial sustainability matters by assessing the significance of actual and potential positive and negative impacts, incorporating feedback and perspectives from eight stakeholder groups — shareholders, employees, customers, business partners, communities, government agencies, civil society organizations, and media representatives — across the 12 countries in which the Company operates. In parallel, the Company assesses sustainability-related risks and opportunities through workshops with executives from each business unit, taking into account their likelihood and potential financial and operational effects. The assessment outcomes are subsequently used to prioritize material sustainability matters topics into three levels — high, medium, and low — across two dimensions: Impact Materiality and Financial Materiality.

03
Validation of Material Sustainability Matters

The Company engages with external experts on the identified material sustainability matters prior to the submission to the Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Committee for review and approval.

Furthermore, the stakeholder inclusivity process and the impact materiality assessment are independently assured by LRQA, an external assurance provider, to verify that the assessment of material impacts is conducted in accordance with the GRI Standards.

04
Integration Into Corporate Management

The Company integrates sustainability considerations into its corporate strategy and enterprise risk management framework. Material sustainability matters assessed as having “high” priority are incorporated as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) for the organization. These indicators are linked to performance evaluations and executive compensation considerations, reinforcing the integration of sustainability and risk management into the organization’s strategic decision-making process.

2025 Sustainability Materiality Assessment Results

The Thailand Operations have integrated key sustainability-related targets and key performance indicators (KPIs) into business unit performance evaluations of senior executives’ remuneration considerations. Performance against these weighted sustainability KPIs forms part of the performance assessment and is considered in determining annual variable remuneration. These include:

Climate Action
Target

Achieve a 25% reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per unit of production from the 2015 baseline, while progressing toward the goal of achieving Net Zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.

Performance Indicators
  • GHG intensity (Unit: tCO2e per unit of production)
  • Energy intensity (Unit: kWh per unit of production)
Food Quality and Safety
Target

Zero product recalls affecting public health.

Performance Indicators
  • Number of product recalls affecting public health (Unit: Cases/year)
  • Number of food quality and safety complaints (Unit: Cases)
Employee Safety, Health, and Well-being
Target

Lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) was 0.6 cases per 1 million hours of work.

Performance Indicators
  • Lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) (Unit: Cases per 1,000,000 working hours)